Table 4.
Stimulation of growth of representative fibrolytic rumen bacteria by bean husks
Rumen bacterial colonizationa | Rumen bacterial abundanceb | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiber or husk, origin | H/C ratioc | By qPCR, × 107/mL | By clone library, % | By qPCR, × 107/mL | ||||||
Fs | Rf | Ra | Fs | Rf | Ra | Fs | Rf | Ra | ||
Beet pulp, Japan | 1.53 | 0.2 | 5.0 | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Rice straw, Japan | 0.68 | 747.4 | 36.7 | 19.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
Chickpea, Myanmar | 0.06 | 476.3 | 72.4 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 229.1 | 1.9 | 0.3 |
Lablab bean, Myanmar | 0.38 | 1044.0 | 27.5 | 91.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 371.5 | 3.2 | 6.0 |
Data are based on Fuma et al. [52] and Ngwe et al. [53]
aEach fiber source was incubated for 24 h in the rumen and colonized bacteria were quantified by quantitative PCR (qPCR)
bBacteria quantified were Fibrobacter succinogenes (Fs), Ruminococcus flavefaciens (Rf) and Ruminococcus albus (Ra)
cHemicellulose/cellulose ratio indicates the degree of complexity of fiber structure