Table 3. Potency outcomes in noncomparative series of RARP.

Study	No.	Nerve sparing approach	Mean age (y)	Potency rate (overall)
Menon et al. [18]	721	Antegrade	60.2	70%
Shikanov et al. [36]	703	Antegrade	58.5	64%
Potdevin et al. [35]	147	Retrograde	58.7	90%
Patel et al. [42]	404	Retrograde	58	97.4%
Patel et al. [62]	332	Retrograde	58.5	89.8%
Kowalczyk et al. [63]	342	Antegrade	59.6	50%
Alemozaffar et al. [41]	400	Retrograde	59.8	59.3%
Ficarra et al. [3]	183	Antegrade	62.3	82%
Ko et al. [47]	172 vs. 172	Antegrade vs. retrograde	57.9 vs. 57.2	85.3% vs. 92.9%

RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Adapted from Kumar et al. J Robot Surg 2016;10:187-200, with permission of Springer [44].