Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 14;184(12):873–883. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww152

Table 1.

Base-Case Parameter Values and Sensitivity Analysis Ranges Used in a Model of Partnership Formation, Times-at-Risk for Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Their Interactions

Parameter Value Source of Derivation Range of Sensitivity Analysis
Proportion of individuals in high sexual activity level 0.07 Chandra, 2011 (30)a
Rate of partner change for low sexual activity level (per year) 0.80 Chandra, 2011 (30)b 0.25–2.50
Rate of partner change for high sexual activity level (per year) 5.00 c
Proportion of partnerships made exclusively with persons at the same sexual activity level (degree of assortativity ε) 0.00 (Proportionate mixing) 0.00–1.00
Rate of sex acts in partnerships (per year) 75.40 Mercer, 2013 (34)
Proportion of time spent single 0.25 Demers, 2012 (35)d
Duration of infection, years 1.40 Insinga, 2010 (31)e 0.25–25.00
Proportion of infections conferring natural immunity 0.60 Carter, 2000 (32)
Duration of natural immunity, years 10.00 Wang, 2004 (33)f
Probability of infection transmission per sex act with an infected person 0.13 Bogaards, 2010 (36)e ,g 0.001–1.00
Interaction effects (χi and φi) 1.00 (No interactions) 0.05–7.76

Abbreviation: HPV, human papillomavirus.

a Based on having had more than 2 sexual partners in the last year.

b Average number among persons with 2 or fewer sexual partners in the last year.

c Manually set to achieve a 6% type-specific prevalence of HPV.

d Based on the proportion of individuals reporting being in a stable partnership.

e Averaged over HPV types.

f We assumed an exponential loss of immunity and found the rate of waning that led to 45% of individuals losing their seropositivity after 6.4 years.

g Calculated so that the average per-infected-partnership probability of infection was 0.79.