Table 2. Comparison between dental anomaly (DA) and non-dental anomaly (NDA) groups based on the development of palatally displaced canines (PDC).

	DA group (n=263)	NDA group (n=467)	Pooled groups (n=730)	Difference chi-square (χ 2 )	Relative Risk (RR)	95% Confidence Interval
PDC Development	43 (16.34%)	29 (6.21%)	72 (9.86%)	18.33 p<0.01*	2.63	(1.69-4.11)
Absence of PDC	220 (83.65%)	438 (93.79%)	658 (90.13%)
Total	263 (100%)	467 (100%)	730 (100%)

* Statistically significant difference at p<0.01