Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;5:e16748. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16748

Figure 7. Measuring the transcriptional response of CCND1-MS2 to Wnt3a activation in living cells.

(a) The percentage of cells in a population of either mock-treated (blue) or Wnt3a-activated cells (red) showing an active CCND1-MS2 transcribing gene, over time. (b) The promoter response time of CCND1-MS2 activation from the addition of Wnt3a (n = 27) or in mock-treated conditions (n = 22). In the boxplots, the median is indicated by a red line, the box represents the interquartile range, the whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values, and red dots represent outliers. (p=0.01). (c,d) Periods of gene activity measured in mock-treated and Wnt3a-treated cells. The population was divided into cases where the gene was either not transcribing before the addition of Wnt3a or mock-treatment (‘off’, n(Wnt3a) = 27, n(Con) = 22, p=0.01) or if the gene was already active (‘on’, n(Wnt3a) = 37, n(Con) = 52, p=0.77). *p<0.05, n.s. = p>0.05. (e) Frames from Video 12 showing the activation of the CCND1-MS2 gene detected by MS2-GFP mRNA tagging (arrow) following Wnt3a treatment. Bar = 10 µm.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16748.028

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Wnt signaling causes shorter rest duration in addition to an increase in the gene burst duration.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

Plots of single cells demonstrate the active (blue) and inactive (red) state of CCND1-MS2 transcribing gene along 6 hr in (a) mock-treated cells (Control, n = 74) and (b) Wnt3a-treated cells (n = 64). Data were taken from live-cell movies with each column representing one cell along 6 hr. Histograms showing the distribution of (c) active and (d) inactive state durations in Wnt3a-treated and mock-treated (Control) cells (p=0.02, p=0.0004 respectively). The curves are a fit to exponential distribution (Golding et al., 2005).