Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016 Sep 6;16(10):1083–1091. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2016.1227243

Table I.

Relative sensitivities of molecular diagnostic tests for CML

Method Target Sensitivity Advantages Disadvantages
Conventional Cytogenetics Chromosomal translocation = t(9;22) 10%-5% The gold standard, and detection of other large chromosomal changes. Require dividing cells and highly skilled technician. Very labor and time intensive. Miss cryptic translocations.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) BCR-ABL1 DNA 0.1%-5% Can use wider range of specimens (PB, BM, FFPE). Can detect cryptic translocations. Relatively insensitive compared with qRT-PCR. Requires skilled technicians. Highly specific to targeted region and will miss other chromosomal changes.
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) BCR-ABL1 mRNA 0.001%-0.01% Very sensitive. Can use wider range of specimens (PB, BM, FFPE). Can detect cryptic translocations. Not well standardized across laboratories. More suceptable to contamination or RNA degradation issues.

CML = chronic myelogenous leukemia, PB = peripheral blood, BM = bone marrow, FFPE = formalin fixed parraffin embedded tissue