. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;96(1):8–16. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000604

Table 2.

a. Relationships (Pearson correlation coefficients, R, and p values) between Simple RT_clin Latency (SRT), Complex RT_clin Accuracy (RRTAcc), and their ratio (RRTAcc:SRT), with UST in subjects with and without DPN
	Unipedal Stance Time
	Subjects without DPN (R/p values)	Subjects with DPN (R/p values)
SRT	−.473/.064	−.520/.008
RRTAcc	.026/.924	.472/.017
RRTAcc:SRT	.319/.229	.653/.004

b. Results of multivariate analyses with UST as the dependent variable
	Subjects without DPN		Subjects with DPN
	RRTAcc/SRT	HipSTR/AnkPRO	RRTAcc/SRT	HipSTR/AnkPRO
Beta	NS	3.82	.505	.525
P value	NS	.002	.001	.001
R²	.580		.680