Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;96(1):8–16. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000604

Table 3.

Relationships (Pearson correlation coefficients, R, and p values) between Simple RTclin Latency (SRT), Complex RTclin Accuracy (RRTAcc), and their ratio RRTAcc:SRT), and step width variability and range on even and uneven surfaces.

Step Width Variability Even Surface Step Width Variability Uneven Surface
Subjects without DPN
R/p values		 Subjects with DPN
(R/p values)		 Subjects without DPN
R/p values		 Subjects with DPN
R/p value
SRT −.025/.936 .331/.143 .485/.093 .443/.050
RRTAcc −0.197/.519 −.397/.075 −.213/.485 −.562/.010
RRTAcc:SRT −0.119/.698 −.481/.027 −.459/.114 −.696/.001
Step Width Range Even Surface Step Width Range Uneven Surface
Subjects without DPN
R/p values		 Subjects with DPN
R/p values		 Subjects without DPN
R/p values		 Subjects with DPN
R/p values
SRT −.134/.662 .232/.311 .570/.042 .484/.030
RRTAcc −0.037/.905 −.245/.285 −.059/.849 −.696/.001
RRTAcc:SRT −0.040/.896 −.308/.174 −.427/.146 −.782/<.001