Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2016 Jun 7;21(10):1065–1071. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1191060

Table 2.

Participant characteristics by marital status group.

Model variables Married/living with a family
member (referent; n = 740)
Living alone (n = 303)

Single (69) Divorced (77) Widowed (157) p-value
Demographics
  Age (years) 66.68 ± 8.45 67.56 ± 9.88 68.06 ± 8.59 79.06 ± 8.43 <0.001
  Men, n (%) 289 (54.1) 37 (53.9) 18 (23.8) 54 (34.3) <0.05
  Black/other, n (%) 20 (3.7) 13 (18.3) 17 (22.0) 19 (12.0) <0.001
  Bachelor’s degree or higher, n (%) 168 (31.5) 24 (34.9) 22 (29.1) 20 (12.8)  0.12
Disabilitya
  ADLs, n (%) 14 (2.7) 1 (2.0) 2 (3.2) 3 (1.9)  0.60
  IADLs, n (%) 42 (7.9) 12 (17.9) 11 (13.7) 29 (18.3)  0.73
Neighborhood characteristicsb
  Physical quality 1.61 ± 0.48 1.89 ± 0.50 1.81 ± 0.59 1.77 ± 0.53 <0.001
  Social quality 1.87 ± 0.57 2.21 ± 0.65 1.94 ± 0.72 1.83 ± 0.54 <0.05
Depressive symptoms (PHQ-8)c 3.11 ± 3.59 5.09 ± 5.11 4.89 ± 5.13 3.67 ± 3.91 <0.001
a

Number (%) of participants reporting any ADL/IADL difficulties versus none.

b

Lower scores = more positive perception of neighborhood.

c

Higher scores = greater frequency of depressive symptoms.