Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct;37(10):1787–1793. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4839

Table 1:

Demographics of groups based on EEG pattern and outcomea

Malignant EEG (n = 0) Malignant EEG (n = 9) Nonmalignant EEG (n = 12) Nonmalignant EEG (n = 12) P Value
Outcome Good Bad Good Bad
Age (median) (IQR) NA 50 (42.5–59.5) 53.5 (43.5–63.0) 58.5 (43–66.0) .252
Female (No.) (%) NA 8 (89) 4 (33) 6 (50) .051
Arrest to MRI (median days) (IQR) NA 3 (2.5–5.0) 5 (4.3–10.3) 4 (3–4) .065
Length of stay (median days) (IQR) NA 9 (5–18) 23 (13–27) 13.5 (6–24.5) .077
GCS at time of MRI (median score) (IQR) 4 (3–6) 10b (8.5–14) 6 (3.5–8) .0014
Rhythm of arrest (No.)
    Asystole NA 2 3 3 .71
    PEA NA 2 1 4
    VF/VT NA 4 6 5
    Unknown NA 1 2 0
Location of arrest (No.)
    In hospital NA 2 1 3 .53
    Out of hospital NA 7 11 9

Note:—IQR indicates interquartile range; PEA, pulseless electrical activity; VF/VT, ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia; NA, not applicable; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale.

a

There were no individuals with malignant EEG and good outcome in this cohort. There were no significant differences by groupings using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests for nonparametric analysis of continuous and categoric variables, respectively; sex and days from arrest to MRI were nearly significant with P = .051 and .065, respectively.

b

P < .01 for comparison with the bad outcome groups; nonsignificant difference between the bad outcome groups.