Table 3.
Subscale | Subscale scores | Item | Item scores | |||
Mean | % | SD | Median | IQRa | ||
Engagement | 3.75 | 75.0 | 0.46 | Entertainment | 4 | 3-4 |
|
|
|
|
Interest | 4 | 3-4 |
|
|
|
|
Customization | 3 | 3-3 |
|
|
|
|
Interactivity | 3 | 3-4 |
|
|
|
|
Target group | 4 | 4-5 |
Functionality | 4.22 | 84.4 | 0.55 | Performance | 4 | 4-5 |
|
|
|
|
Ease of use | 5 | 4-5 |
|
|
|
|
Navigation | 4 | 4-5 |
|
|
|
|
Gestural design | 4 | 4-5 |
Aesthetics | 3.79 | 75.9 | 0.55 | Layout | 4 | 4-5 |
|
|
|
|
Graphics | 4 | 3-4 |
|
|
|
|
Visual appeal | 4 | 3-4 |
Information | 4.12 | 82.3 | 0.51 | Quality of information | 4 | 4-4 |
|
|
|
|
Quantity of information | 4 | 4-5 |
|
|
|
|
Visual information | 4 | 4-4 |
|
|
|
|
Credibility of source | 4 | 4-5 |
Subjective quality | 3.14 | 62.8 | 0.74 | Would recommend the app | 4 | 3-5 |
|
|
|
|
Would use the app in the next 12 months | 3 | 2-3 |
|
|
|
|
Would buy the app | 3 | 1-3 |
|
|
|
|
Overall star rating | 4 | 3-4 |
aIQR: interquartile range.