Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug 24;101(35):13050–13055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404944101

Table 2.

SI of the individual connections of the target-related network (Fig. 3C Right) for the no-AB and the AB condition at times 406 and 552 ms

Connection No-AB 406 ms AB 406 ms No-AB 552 ms AB 552 ms Modulation Significance, P
occ-front R 0.000 0.003 0.006 −0.002 0.011 1.5e-10
occ-temp R 0.003 0.004 0.008 0.001 0.008 1.5e-10
occ-ppcR −0.016 −0.009 0.023 0.017 0.013 2.7e-4
frontL-ppcL 0.003 0.010 −0.004 −0.001 0.004 1.5e-10
frontL-ppcR −0.019 0.005 0.016 0.015 0.025 1.5e-10
frontR-tempR −0.000 −0.002 −0.003 −0.003 −0.002 3.9e-9
frontR-ppcR −0.014 −0.005 0.014 0.011 0.012 1.5e-10
tempL-ppcR −0.015 −0.004 0.011 0.015 0.007 1.6e-3
tempR-ppcR −0.007 −0.003 0.018 0.014 0.008 2.4e-7
ppcL-ppcR −0.009 0.002 0.021 0.013 0.019 6.6e-5
ppcR-cing −0.012 0.002 0.018 0.012 0.02 2.7e-9

The table lists the SI values for the two main conditions, AB and no-AB, for the individual connections of the target-related network. It describes the main effect of the AB for the individual connections by listing the SI values at times 406 and 552 ms corresponding to the synchronization to the mask (distractor after the first target) and the second target. Task-related modulation was computed as (col4-col2) - (col5-col3), where col n denotes the nth column of the table. The last column shows significances of modulation computed with a Kruskal-Wallis test.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure