Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 5;2016:2356870. doi: 10.1155/2016/2356870

Table 4.

The differences in selected parameters of humoral immunity between the study groups.

Evaluated parameters Patients with DFUs (n = 68) Diabetic controls (n = 34) p value
IgM (g/L) 1.1 ± 0.82 0.94 ± 0.42 NS
IgA (g/L) 3.56 ± 1.32 2.62 ± 1 p < 0.001
IgG (g/L) 12.24 ± 3.19 10.83 ± 1.69 p < 0.05
IgG1 (g/L) 6.85 ± 2.19 5.3 ± 1.28 p < 0.001
IgG2 (g/L) 4.12 ± 1.85 4.12 ± 1.4 NS
IgG3 (g/L) 0.81 ± 0.51 0.62 ± 0.27 p < 0.05
IgG4 (g/L) 0.47 ± 0.4 0.43 ± 0.38 NS
Deficit of IgG1 (<3,82 g/L) 2/68 (3%) 3/34 (9%) NS
Deficit of IgG2 (<2,42 g/L) 15/68 (22%) 5/34 (15%) NS
Deficit of IgG3 (<0,22 g/L) 0 0 NS
Deficit of IgG4 (<0,04 g/L) 3/68 (4%) 2/34 (6%) NS

Data are presented as means ± SD; patients with DFUs (diabetic foot ulcers; n = 68); age, sex, and type of diabetes matched diabetic controls (n = 34); Ig: immunoglobulin; NS: nonsignificant; p value of significance between patients with DFUs and diabetic controls determined using t-test or Mann–Whitney test.