Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 22;113(50):14231–14236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609983113

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Application of the bounds to the nonequilibrium 2D growth process. (A) We assemble a 2D configuration from a monomer bath containing red and blue blocks. The energy of interaction between similar monomers is ϵs, whereas that between dissimilar monomers is ϵd. As discussed in the main text, when the assembly is grown at equilibrium, the statistics of compositional fluctuations in the assembly are equivalent to that of an Ising magnet with coupling constant J=ϵsϵd2. (B) We compare the value of critical driving force δμc obtained by computing Jeff using the Onsager solution, as described in the main text, with that obtained by computing the variance of magnetization fluctuations as described in ref. 24. The agreement between the two estimates confirms that the system has anomalously large fluctuations at the nonequilibrium critical driving force we identify. (C) We calculate the probability of magnetization from the nonequilibrium simulations and compare it with distribution obtained by sampling an Ising model at Jeff and Jb from Eq. 7. These data were obtained for J=0.65 and δμ=0.1. The system grows rapidly for these parameters as evidenced by the value of Jeff computed for these parameters. We expect the system to be far from linear response. The close agreement between the distribution predicted by Jb and the nonequilibrium distribution, even far from the mean, suggest that our theoretical bound indeed accurately captures the fluctuations in this nonequilibrium system.