Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;113(50):14426–14431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609308113

Table S1.

Load-independent hemodynamic measures

Parameter WT (n = 11) β-arrestin 1 KO (n = 4) β-arrestin 2 KO (n = 6) AT1R KO (n = 13)
Compliance parameters
 EDPVR (linear) slope 0.26 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.04
 EDPVR (linear) intercept −3.06 ± 1.34 −1.46 ± 1.72 −2.45 ± 1.26 −7.74 ± 2.67
 EDPVR (quadratic) β coefficient 0.083 ± 0.015 0.038 ± 0.010 0.115 ± 0.041 0.047 ± 0.008
 EDPVR (quadratic) α coefficient 1.164 ± 0.445 1.974 ± 0.992 1.070 ± 0.563 1.260 ± 0.554
Contractility parameters
 ESPVR (linear) slope 4.02 ± 0.68 3.19 ± 0.29 3.48 ± 0.91 2.68 ± 0.26
 ESPVR (linear) intercept −4.53 ± 7.39 −6.60 ± 7.59 −7.19 ± 10.55 −12.12 ± 6.71
 ESPVR (quadratic) a −1.82 ± 1.14 −0.61 ± 0.25 −0.34 ± 0.12 −0.04 ± 0.01*
 ESPVR (quadratic) V0 9.85 ± 5.80 4.70 ± 7.00 9.47 ± 4.95 −0.90 ± 5.68
 ESPVR (quadratic) E′max 16.09 ± 3.84 11.59 ± 2.24 9.93 ± 1.93 5.02 ± 0.55*
 PRSW slope 59.69 ± 4.11 59.26 ± 4.91 42.63 ± 7.86 44.46 ± 4.83
 PRSW intercept 8.10 ± 6.94 9.88 ± 4.53 1.87 ± 8.70 −0.92 ± 3.68
 dP/dtmax vs. EDV slope 154.50 ± 22.74 103.50 ± 9.78 88.09 ± 10.21 113.40 ± 17.71
 dP/dtmax vs. EDV intercept −14.59 ± 8.39 −19.63 ± 5.16 −32.39 ± 11.67 −30.26 ± 13.79
 Emax 7.79 ± 1.29 8.29 ± 1.11 6.44 ± 1.41 4.80 ± 0.47

Average load-independent parameters obtained by inferior vena cava constriction performed on a separate cohort of WT (n = 11), β-arrestin 1 KO (n = 4), β-arrestin 2 KO (n = 6), and AT1R KO (n = 7) mice. Parameters of LV compliance (linear- and quadratic-derived EDPVR) and LV contractility (linear- and quadratic-derived ESPVR, PRSW, dP/dtmax vs. EDV and Emax) are listed separately for each genotype. Errors reflect SEM. ESPVR, end-systolic PV relationship; a, coefficient of curvilinearity; Vo, volume intercept; E′max, maximum slope of quadratic ESPVR; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; Emax, maximal elastance.

*

P < 0.05 vs. WT, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test.