Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;11(12):e0167203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167203

Table 2. Number of clusters identified on the different analysis.

Number of clusters Number of clusters Number of clusters Number of clusters
Method NJ (Cutoff value 2%) ABGD (relative gap width-0.1) BIN GMYC
All dataset 124 156 113* 149
Clade 1 22 27 23 49
Clade 2 19 22 2* 15
Clade 3 22 36 23 30
Clade 4 6 6 5 5
Clade 5 55 65 58 50

Each column shows the different method including NJ, ABGD, BIN and GMYC. Also is presented the number of clusters identified in each clade.

*Incomplete sampling (see text for details)