Table 2. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for quality assessment of studies selected for the meta-analysis.
Study | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | Flow and timing | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | |
Yagi K et al. 2002 [14] | ? | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ |
Yagi K et al. 2002 [15] | ? | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ |
Nakagawa S et al. 2003 [16] a | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Nakagawa S et al. 2003 [16] a | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Nakagawa S et al. 2003 [16] a | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Yang JM et al. 2003 [17] | ? | ? | ? | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ |
Egi Y et al. 2006 [18] | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. 2007 [19] | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ |
Bansal A et al. 2008 [20] | ? | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ |
Gonen C et al. 2009 [21] b | ? | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Gonen C et al. 2009 [21] b | ? | ☺ | ? | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Gonen C et al. 2009 [21] b | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Gonen C et al. 2009 [21] b | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Tahara T et al. 2009 [22] | ? | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Qi QQ et al. 2013 [23] c | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Qi QQ et al. 2013 [23] c | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Kawamura M et al. 2013 [24] | ☺ | ? | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Liu H et al. 2014 [25] | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☺ |
☺Low Risk; ☹High Risk;? Unclear Risk. a, b, c indicate studies identified from one article.