Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;11(12):e0168201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168201

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy for H. pylori infection.

Study group Number of studies Diagnostic performance I2 for DOR
Sensitivity 95%CI Specificity 95%CI LR+ 95%CI LR- 95%CI DOR 95%CI AUC
All 18 0.89 (0.87–0.91) 0.82 (0.79–0.85) 5.16 (3.32–8.02) 0.11 (0.07–0.18) 59.58 (30.63–115.88) 0.9461 67.10
Observed site
Antrum 5 0.82 (0.78–0.86) 0.72 (0.66–0.78) 2.99 (1.39–6.44) 0.25 (0.15–0.40) 14.72 (8.86–24.47) 0.8611 0.00
Corpus 11 0.92 (0.90–0.94) 0.86 (0.82–0.88) 5.96 (3.88–9.15) 0.06 (0.03–0.13) 127.38 (48.29–336.05) 0.9702 70.60
Diagnostic criterion
“pit plus vascular pattern” in corpus 6 0.96 (0.94–0.97) 0.91 (0.87–0.93) 9.56 (4.72–19.34) 0.05 (0.03–0.08) 203.69 (77.11–538.02) 0.9872 29.70
Endoscopy mode
White light endoscopy 11 0.90 (0.87–0.91) 0.81 (0.77–0.84) 4.88 (2.63–9.08) 0.09 (0.04–0.19) 75.28 (30.11–188.21) 0.9576 68.60
Chromoendoscopy 7 0.87 (0.83–0.91) 0.85 (0.80–0.88) 5.44 (3.54–8.35) 0.13 (0.06–0.26) 46.52 (15.68–138.03) 0.9238 67.20

LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR-, negative likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.