Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;7:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00201

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics, pain assessment, and psychological variables at baseline (T0).

Intervention group Control group T/Chisq DF P
Number of subjects 20 20
Age, M ± SD 56.65 ± 8.88 56.45 ± 7.28 −0.078 38 0.938
Female sex, % 14 (70%) 14 (70%) 0.000 1 1.000
Partnership (firm relationship), N (%) 14 (70%) 17 (85%) 1.290 1 0.451
Education (>10 years in school), N (%) 6 (30%) 9 (45%) 0.960 1 0.514
Working status, N (%)
Employed 13 (65%) 12 (60%) 1.264 3 1.000
Unemployed 0 (0%) 1 (5%)
Retired 6 (30%) 6 (30%)
Others 1 (5%) 1 (5%)
Pain assessment
Days with pain last 4 weeks (0–28), M ± SD 26.95 ± 4.70 25.95 ± 5.13 −0.643 38 0.524
CBP intensity (NRS 0–10), M ± SD 4.93 ± 2.41 5.65 ± 1.66 1.108 38 0.275
History of CBP, N (%)
<1 year 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1.039 2 1.000
1–10 years 8 (40%) 7 (35%)
>10 years 12 (60%) 12 (60%)
Number of painful areas (0–10), M ± SD 6.45 ± 2.31 5.70 ± 1.75 −1.159 38 0.254
MPI interference (0–6), M ± SD 2.83 ± 1.57 2.98 ± 1.38 0.324 38 0.747
Pain medication, N (%) 11 (55%) 11 (55%) 0.000 1 1.000

T/Chisq, test statistic; DF, degrees of freedom; P, P values; M, mean; CBP, chronic back pain; NRS, Numerical Rating Scale; MPI, West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory.