Table 2.
The GoF, MWs and IIS of selected PMN/DMN under different combinations of model order and spatial smoothing levels using IVA-GL
| IVA-GL | SM 0 | SM 6 | SM 9 | SM 12 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMN | DMN | PMN | DMN | PMN | DMN | PMN | DMN | |
| MO 20 | ||||||||
| GoF | – | 0.40 | – | 0.36 | – | 0.36 | – | 0.37 |
| MWs | – | 3.19 | – | 3.07 | – | 3.02 | – | 2.96 |
| IISa | – | 0.29 (0.05) | – | 0.49 (0.05) | – | 0.52 (0.08) | – | 0.57 (0.09) |
| MO 40 | ||||||||
| GoF | – | 0.45 | 0.46 | – | 0.46 | 0.35 | – | 0.37 |
| MWs | – | 3.22 | 3.90 | – | 3.99 | 3.12 | – | 3.55 |
| IISa | – | 0.29 (0.05) | 0.47 (0.06) | – | 0.43 (0.09) | 0.52 (0.07) | – | 0.44 (0.10) |
| MO 60 | ||||||||
| GoF | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.52 | – | 0.50 | 0.37 |
| MWs | 4.01 | 3.16 | 4.21 | 3.16 | 4.27 | – | 4.26 | 3.43 |
| IISa | 0.27 (0.04) | 0.31 (0.04) | 0.43 (0.06) | 0.45 (0.06) | 0.55 (0.06) | – | 0.57 (0.08) | 0.61 (0.06) |
| MO 80 | ||||||||
| GoF | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.51 | – | 0.48 | – |
| MWs | 4.27 | 3.23 | 4.37 | 3.44 | 4.44 | – | 4.49 | – |
| IISa | 0.19 (0.04) | 0.30 (0.04) | 0.45 (0.06) | 0.44 (0.06) | 0.58 (0.06) | – | 0.66 (0.05) | – |
| MO 100 | ||||||||
| GoF | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.37 | – | 0.51 |
| MWs | 4.23 | 3.37 | 4.26 | 3.36 | 4.30 | 4.30 | – | 3.33 |
| IISa | 0.19 (0.04) | 0.33 (0.04) | 0.47 (0.06) | 0.52 (0.06) | 0.60 (0.06) | 0.67 (0.05) | – | 0.69 (0.08) |
“–” indicates the corresponding IC was not found
aData presented as mean (standard deviation)