Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;6(11):e011987. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011987

Table 2.

Scores for habitual eating behaviour in day workers and rotating shift workers

  Normal Day workers Shift workers
(Ref. 23) n=39 n=123 Cohen's d p Values
Cognition of constitution*† (points) 14 14.3±3.4 13.6±3.7 0.19 0.328
Motivation for eating‡§ (points) 18 19.5±4.9 18.8±5.6 0.13 0.384
Eating as a diversion‡¶ (points) 7 7.4±2.4 7.1±2.9 0.11 0.310
Feeling of satiety‡ (points) 10 10.9±3.1 11.3±3.2 0.13 0.427
Eating style‡ (points) 9 9.8±3.5 9.7±3.6 0.03 0.629
Meal contents‡ (points) 12 13.9±3.9 15.6±4.5 0.39 0.045
Temporal eating patterns‡** (points) 16 16.5±4.5 19.5±4.8 0.63 0.001

Values are means±SD.

Higher scores indicate more improper eating behaviour in terms of a higher probability of obesity: Cognition of weight and constitution, having false recognition of and assumptions about reasons for weight gain; Motivation for eating, having behavioural factors which can induce over-eating; Eating as a diversion, being subject to psychological factors which increase appetite (ie, perceived mental stress); Feeling of satiety, being prone to have an appetite and to eat as much as possible; Eating style, being prone to eat fast; Meal contents, having a preference for a high fat diet and sweets (eg, confectioneries and sweet buns); Temporal eating patterns, irregularity of timing and number of meals taken during the day and delay in timing of meals.

*t-test.

‡Mann-Whitney U test.

§Shift workers, n=122.

¶Day workers, n=38.

**Shift workers, n=119.