Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e012537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012537

Table 3.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of predictors of second-line ART failure of adult HIV positive patients at University of Gondar, Debretabor, and Felege Hiwot referral hospitals, September 2006 to April 2015

Treatment failure
Crude HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Variable Yes No
Age (years)
 15–29 17 61 1 *
 30–39 26 141 0.7 (0.4 to 1.3) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.4)
 40–49 14 68 0.8 (0.4 to 1.5) 0.9 (0.4 to 1.8)
 ≥50 10 19 1.8 (0.8 to 4.0) 1.7 (0.8 to 3.9)
INH prophylaxis
 Yes 3 30 2.3 (0.7 to 7.2) 1.7 (0.5 to 5.7)
 No 64 259 1
Weight change (per 1 kg increase) 0.9 (0.89 to 0.96) 0.916 (0.88 to 0.95)
WHO clinical staging at switch
 I/II 20 107 1
 III 29 143 0.8 (0.5 to 1.5) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.8)
 IV 18 39 1.6 (0.8 to 3.0) 2.1 (1.1 to 4.1)
CD4 cell count
 <100 cells/mm3 47 175 1.8 (1.0 to 2.9) 2 (1.2 to 3.5)
 ≥100 cells/mm3 20 114 1
NRTI‡ at first-line ART start
 Stavudine (d4T) 29 104 1  
 Zidovudine (AZT) 15 137 0.9 (0 0.5 to 1.5) 0.9 (0.5 to 1.6)
 Tenofovir (TDF) 13 48 1.8 (0.9 to 3.6) 1.9 (0.9 to 3.8)

*Non-significant from the multivariable Cox regression.

ART, antiretroviral therapy; AZT, as lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine; INH,isoniazid; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.