Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;6(12):e011925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011925

Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted OR and 95% CI of knee pain by socioeconomic factors

Unadjusted OR Adjusted OR
Associated factor Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Gender
 Male (Ref)
 Female 1.03 (0.89 to 1.18) 1.23 (1.04 to 1.45) 0.69 (0.44 to 1.11)
Ethnicity
 Malay (Ref)
 Chinese 0.55 (0.47 to 0.64) 0.51 (0.43 to 0.61) 0.31 (0.14 to 0.68)
 Indian 1.45 (1.17 to 1.81) 1.42 (1.12 to 1.78) 1.46 (0.55 to 3.91)
Age (years)
 ≤30 (Ref)
 31–40 1.41 (1.14 to 1.75) 1.19 (0.94 to 1.51) 1.10 (0.69 to 1.75)
 >40 1.76 (1.43 to 2.18) 1.60 (1.26 to 2.02) 1.26 (0.81 to 1.96)
Residence
 Urban (Ref)
 Rural 0.79 (0.69 to 0.91) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.16) 0.92 (0.76 to 1.12)
Education
 Tertiary (Ref)
 Secondary 1.26 (1.02 to 1.55) 1.37 (1.07 to 1.75) 1.47 (1.03 to 2.11)
 Primary or non-formal 1.23 (1.05 to 1.43) 1.23 (1.04 to 1.45) 1.33 (1.07 to 1.66)
Employment status
 No (Ref)
 Yes 1.06 (0.91 to 1.23) 0.99 (0.83 to 1.18) 0.87 (0.68 to 1.11)
Ethnicity×gender
 Chinese×female 1.22 (0.83 to 1.79)
 Indian×female 2.09 (1.21 to 3.60)
Gender×age group
 Female×age group (31–40) 1.24 (0.75 to 2.07)
 Female×age group (>40) 1.96 (1.21 to 3.17)

Model 1: adjusted for other factors shown in the table.

Model 2: adjusted for other factors.

Model 3: adjusted for all possible two-way interactions terms with ethnicity. Only interaction terms that were significant are presented.