Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;17:543. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1397-7

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Illustration of the complementary detection capabilities of DIP and CC using two different contaminated samples. Left: Using a mutual 9-nearest-neighbor graph, CC identifies two clusters (very small contamination) while DIP isn’t able to detect multimodality as seen in the distribution of pairwise distances below. Right: Two overlapping clusters prevent CC from detecting two components while DIP detects significant multimodality in the distribution of pairwise distances