Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):251–255. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1190294

Table 1.

Heterogeneity Statistics for Dimensions of Targeting

Dimension QB1 df QB/df
Intervention technique
  Normative arguments 173.09 199 0.869798995
  Attitudinal arguments 53.74 199 0.270050251
  Informational arguments 2.95 199 0.014824121
  Behavioral skills arguments 44.49 199 0.223567839
  Threat inducing arguments 201.43 199 1.012211055
  Condom provision 33.78 199 0.169748744
  Condom skills training 0.71 122 0.005819672
  Interpersonal skills training 10.14 122 0.083114754
  Self-managements training 251.08 122 2.058032787
  HIV counseling and testing 125.28 122 1.026885246
Recipient variables
  Gender 7.26 105 0.069142857
  Ethnicity 54.2 105 0.516190476
  Age similarity 89.12 149 0.598120805
Source
  Expertise 224.91 149 1.509463087
  Age similarity 54.21 105 0.516285714
  Gender similarity 90.67 105 0.86352381
Clinical setting 0 200 0
Intervention technique (HIV CT) × recipient ethnicity 137.74 199 0.692160804
Recipient × source (Expertise × ethnicity) 167.6 151 1.109933775
Clinical setting × behavioral skills arguments 158.07 199 0.794321608