Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;6:39152. doi: 10.1038/srep39152

Table 1. Details of the 16 microsatellite markers developed and optimized.

Locus ID NA Range HO HE PIC NAF GenBank Acc. Nº
D.tru2 18 97–148 0.590 0.830 0.809 0.133 HG792255
D.tru4 14 151–179 0.641 0.750 0.716 0.123 HG792256
D.tru6 29 69–133 0.408 0.796 0.777 0.327 HG792257
D.tru8 14 127–169 0.670 0.823 0.796 0.109 HG792258
D.tru11 26 97–153 0.469 0.715 0.700 0.211 HG792259
D.tru14 19 75–135 0.207 0.557 0.534 0.540 HG792260
D.tru15 33 215–279 0.592 0.947 0.942 0.218 HG792261
D.tru16 26 70–124 0.768 0.912 0.903 0.093 HG792262
D.tru19 28 126–184 0.542 0.935 0.929 0.223 HG792263
D.tru22 12 215–249 0.280 0.689 0.639 0.410 HG792264
D.tru23 33 101–167 0.738 0.835 0.825 0.066 HG792265
D.tru26 28 55–119 0.590 0.924 0.917 0.223 HG792266
D.tru29 21 262–322 0.261 0.826 0.808 0.487 HG792268
D.tru32 25 196–284 0.323 0.674 0.659 0.425 HG792271
D.tru40 23 119–167 0.578 0.889 0.878 0.229 HG792273
D.tru49 15 144–182 0.238 0.801 0.771 0.553 HG792275

514 individuals from 7 sampling sites were used for these analyses. Locus identity, (NA) number of alleles found, (Range) range of allele sizes, (HO) observed and (HE) expected heterozygosity, (PIC) polymorphism information content, (NAF) null-allele frequency and GenBank accession numbers.