Table 2. Characteristics of the sampling sites including the number of clams genotyped (N), observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity and the genetic effective population size (Ne estimate) with the lower (lower CI) and the higher (higher CI) confidence intervals.
N | Ho | He | Ar | Ne estimate | lower CI | higher CI | Situation* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isla Canela | 85 | 0.533 | 0.799 | 14.327 | 210 | 165.1 | 238.6 | at high long-term risk of extinction |
Doñana | 86 | 0.517 | 0.817 | 14.689 | 1191.7 | 526.9 | ∞ | at evolutionary potential |
Caleta de Vélez | 56 | 0.516 | 0.773 | 13.109 | 782.5 | 320 | ∞ | at high long-term risk of extinction |
Cabo de Gata | 86 | 0.463 | 0.826 | 13.573 | 357.2 | 245 | 635.6 | at high long-term risk of extinction |
Gandía | 53 | 0.468 | 0.769 | 12.577 | 332.5 | 203.3 | 845.1 | at high long-term risk of extinction |
Sant Carles de la Ràpita | 62 | 0.423 | 0.758 | 11.136 | 602.7 | 282.9 | ∞ | at high long-term risk of extinction |
Roses | 86 | 0.486 | 0.756 | 15.202 | 600.3 | 340.4 | 2210.8 | at high long-term risk of extinction |
The use of ∞ indicates inestimable upper confidence limits* 56.