Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;6:39478. doi: 10.1038/srep39478

Table 4. QTL information of plant height in peanut in three environments.

Environment LG QTL Pos. (cM) CI (cM)a LODb Ac R2 (%)d Joint_R2 (%)e
2013 A04 qPHA4.1a 54.9 54.6–55.0 6.39 −6.61 15.37 53.3
    qPHA4.1b 58.1 57.3–58.5 6.9 −6.93 16.57
    qPHA4.1c 61.9 61.5–62.7 7.98 −7.35 18.7
    qPHA4.1d 70.4 70.1–71.5 7.31 −7.67 20.52
  A09 qPHA9.1 33.7 30.7–34.6 2.84 4.14 6.04
  B03 qPHB3.1 61.9 61.4–62.6 5.21 −6.08 11.24
2014 A03 qPHA3.2a 94.3 93.2–94.8 2.58 3.99 4.85 65.5
    qPHA3.2b 103.6 103.4–105.9 4.05 5.1 7.48
  A04 qPHA4.2a 60.6 60.0–60.8 4.9 −5.58 9.45
    qPHA4.2b 69.4 67.0–71.4 4.78 −6.04 10.84
  B06 qPHB6.2a 47 46.1–47.4 2.64 4.28 5
    qPHB6.2b 54.7 54.7–55.6 3.5 4.85 6.6
    qPHB6.2c 64.3 63.7–64.7 3.8 4.99 6.99
2015 A04 qPHA4.3 61.9 61.9–62.6 7.06 −5.8 14.47 62.3
  B04 qPHB4.3a 75.4 73.5–76.2 3.3 5.06 10.33
    qPHB4.3b 98.5 97.7–101.1 4.4 4.61 9.24
  B06 qPHB6.3a 67.5 67.2–68.6 3.96 4.3 7.77
    qPHB6.3b 77.7 75.6–78.0 2.59 3.52 5.23

aConfidence interval; bLogarithm of odds; cAdditive value; dPhenotypic variance explained by each QTL. ePhenotypic variance explained jointly by all identified QTLs.