Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;7(27):41306–41319. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9320

Table 1. Correlation between the clinical pathological factors and expression of miR-374a, CCND1 in CRC.

The expression of miR-374a and CCND1
Clinical parameter n HH (n, %) HL (n, %) LH (n, %) LL (n, %) χ2 value P value
gender
 male 48 11 (22.9) 6 (12.5) 20 (41.7) 11 (22.9) 4.218 0.239
 female 42 12 (28.6) 1 (2.4) 22 (52.4) 7 (16.7)
age (year)
 > 65 52 13 (25) 5 (9.6) 24 (46.2) 10 (19.2) 10.028 0.018
 ≤ 65 38 10 (26.3) 2 (5.3) 18 (47.4) 8 (21.1)
T stage
 T1–T2 15 2 (13.3) 1 (6.7) 9 (60.0) 3 (20.0) 1.766 0.622
 T3–T4 75 21 (28.0) 6 (8.0) 33 (44.0) 15 (20.0)
N stage
 N0 58 13 (22.4) 6 (10.3) 30 (51.7) 9 (15.5) 4.545 0.208
 N1–N2 32 10 (31.2) 1 (3.1) 12 (37.5) 9 (28.1)
pathological grading
 I–II 48 13 (27.1) 4 (8.3) 24 (50.0) 7 (14.6) 1.889 0.596
 III–IV 42 10 (23.8) 3 (7.1) 18 (42.9) 11 (26.2)
*

HH represents high miR-374a with high CCND1 expression, HL represents high miR-374a with low CCND1 expression, LH represents low miR-374a with high CCND1 expression, LL represents low miR-374a with low CCND1 expression.