Table 3.
Logistic regression: Impact of parenting efficacy and assistance with child- care on likelihood of having at least one child living with someone else.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent Variables |
B | SE | Odds Ratio |
95% CI | B | SE | Odds Ratio |
95% CI | B | SE | Odds Ratio |
95% CI |
Constant | .949 | 1.073 | 2.582 | 1.901 | 1.186 | 6.695 | 3.913 | 1.531 | 50.057 | |||
Age | −.027 | .023 | .973 | .931– 1.017 |
−.044 | .024 | .957 | .912– 1.004 |
−.044 | .025 | .957 | .912– 1.005 |
Race | −.898* | .358 | .407 | .202– .821 |
−.762* | .367 | .467 | .227– .958 |
−.927* | .382 | .396 | .187– .836 |
Education | −.156 | .252 | .856 | .522– 1.402 |
−.142 | .256 | .867 | .525– 1.432 |
−.035 | .265 | .966 | .574– 1.624 |
Number of children 0–5 |
.025 | .216 | 1.026 | .671– 1.567 |
−.004 | .218 | .996 | .649– 1.528 |
−.059 | .223 | .943 | .608– 1.460 |
Number of children 6–18 |
.559*** | .152 | 1.749 | 1.299– 2.455 |
.659*** | .164 | 1.933 | 1.402– 2.666 |
.651*** | .167 | 1.917 | 1.383– 2.659 |
Problems with children |
.003 | .167 | 1.003 | .724– 1.391 |
.021 | .169 | 1.021 | .733– 1.423 |
−.007 | .172 | .993 | .709– 1.391 |
Help with child care |
−.060* | .030 | .941 | .888– .998 |
−.040 | .031 | .960 | .903– 1.021 |
||||
Parenting Efficacy |
−.064* | .029 | .938 | .886– .993 |
||||||||
χ2=31.444***; Pseudo R2= .225; −2LL= 203.919 |
χ2Δ= 4.371* χ2= 35.815***; Pseudo R2= .253; −2LL= 199.549 |
χ2Δ=5.047* χ2= 40.862***; Pseudo R2= .284; −2LL= 194.501 |
=p<.05;
=p<.01;
=p<.001
B=Unstandardized Regression Coefficient
SE=Standard Error
CI=Confidence Interval
R2=Variance accounted for
−2LL=Log Likelihood