Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;7:1992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01992

Table 2.

Results from multiple linear regression models predicting the facets of drive for muscularity (DMS).

Drive for muscularity DMS mean score
DMS attitudes
DMS behavior
β t ra(bc) β t ra(bc) β t ra(bc)
Age -0.36 -5.81∗∗∗ -0.35 -0.35 -5.74∗∗∗ -0.34 -0.29 -4.68∗∗∗ -0.28
FFMI 0.07 1.11 0.07 -0.07 -1.12 -0.07 0.23 3.70∗∗∗ 0.22
Self-esteem – physical attractiveness -0.22 -2.93∗∗ -0.12 -0.20 -2.84∗∗ -0.11 -0.19 -2.13 -0.11
Self-esteem – fitness -0.20 -3.34∗∗ -0.14 -0.17 -3.05∗∗ -0.12 -0.19 -2.61 -0.13
Performance-related self-esteem -0.04 -0.60 -0.03 -0.03 -0.44 -0.02 -0.05 -0.59 -0.03
Global self-esteem 0.10 0.90 0.04 -0.01 -0.08 -0.00 0.21 1.62 0.08
Dissatisfaction with muscularity 0.15 3.23∗∗ 0.13 0.21 4.81∗∗∗ 0.19 0.04 0.63 0.03
Dissatisfaction with body fat 0.04 0.83 0.03 0.02 0.50 0.02 0.05 0.91 0.05
Internalization media body ideals 0.47 10.34∗∗∗ 0.42 0.41 9.39∗∗∗ 0.37 0.45 8.13∗∗∗ 0.41
Stressful peer experiences -0.02 -0.45 -0.02 -0.01 -0.30 -0.01 -0.03 -0.46 -0.02

Model fit Step 1 F(2,245) = 16.969∗∗∗ F(2,245) = 20.327∗∗∗ F(2,245) = 14.113∗∗∗
Step 2 F(10,237) = 35.898∗∗∗ F(10,237) = 41.777∗∗∗ F(10,237) = 16.544∗∗∗
R2 Step 1 0.12 0.14 0.10
R2 Step 2 0.60 0.64 0.41
ΔR2 0.48 0.50 0.31

ra(b c), semi-partial correlation, p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, FFMI, fat-free mass index; Step 1, age and FFMI; Step 2, psychological and sociocultural factors.