Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 9;3(1):e000104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000104

Table 1.

Studies on the beneficial or deleterious effect of NSBBs on advanced cirrhosis

Author, year, Ref Design (n) End point Characteristics (RA) Presence of oesophageal varices non-BB vs BB CPT-C non-BB vs BB (%) MAP non-BB vs BB Doses BB Follow-up (month) HR Other outcomes
Sertsé et al 201052 Observational
Prospective, 151
Long-term survival RA (100%) 4% vs 100% 61% vs 74% 123 vs 103 114 mg/day 8 m HR 2.61 (1.63 to 4.19) 1-year probability survival propranolol 19%vs 64% p <0.0001
Mandorfer et al 201470 Observational
Retrospective, 607 (182 SBP)
Impact of SBP on BB on survival SBP (NS) 60% vs 94% 53% vs 67% 83 vs 77 NS 9.6 (147 person year) HR 1.64 (1.1 to 2.3) Patients with SBP on BB increase in mortality risk of 58%
Leithead et al 201571 Observational
Retrospective, 322 (208 matched)
Mortality Ascites on transplant list (117 (76 matched, 36.5%)) Previous variceal haemorrhage
29% vs 29%
NS 89 vs 86 74.8% P (80 mg/day)
25.2% C (6.25 mg/day)
2.4 (72 days) HR 0.55 (0.32 to 0.95)
RA: HR 0.35 (0.14 to 0.86)
Mortality after listing 23.2% BB vs 34.8% no-BB
Bossen et al 201575 Post hoc
Analysis of 3 RCT, 1188
Mortality or hospitalisation Ascites in RCT of satavaptan/placebo
588 (49%)
559 BB users (46%)
Previous variceal haemorrhage
13% vs 30%
28% vs 24% 85 vs 83 159 high dose (>80 mg/day) P
or >6.25 mg/day C
12 (52 weeks) 0.92 (0.72 to 1.18)
RA: 1.02 (0.74 to 1.40)
HR high dose vs no-BB users 0.8 (0.55 to 1.20)
HR low dose vs no-BB users 0.98 (0.72 to 1.13)
Mookerjee et al 201631 Observational prospective, 349 Mortality at 28 days ACLF (NS) NS. Previous gastrointestinal bleeding 17% vs 58% NS 79 vs 78 40 mg/day (68%) 12 (56 weeks) 0.60 (0.36 to 0.98) 1-year mortality NSBB vs no-NSBB 52% vs 56% p=0.35
Gianelli et al 201682 Observational, retrospective 526 Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy Transplant waitlist (NS) NS NS NS NS NS NS Systolic dysfunction was higher in MELD>25 with BB, and similar in MELD<25 regardless BB
Aday et al 201672 Retrospective, 2419
Propensity matching score on
In-hospital mortality Portal hypertension (100%) 51% vs 49% Severe ascites no BB 62% vs 37% on BB NS NS NS NS The highest mortality was among those with cirrhosis and severe ascites no-BB (23.2%, compared with 6.5% BB)
Robins et al 201474 Observational retrospective, 114 Survival Cirrhosis undergoing elective paracentesis (100%) 54% vs 100% 64% vs 64% NS. 48.9 mg/day Median 10 (2–72) NS Median survival BB vs no-BB 18 vs 11 months p=0.93
Kim et al 201468 Nested case–control, 2250 Association BB-AKI RA on transplant list (NS) NS NS NS NS Median 20.3 (3–201) NS
Bhutta et al 201676 Prospective analysis, 717 Survival Ascites 17% vs 31% NS NS NS NS NS Survival 58 days in BB vs 32 days n-BB
Chirapongsathorn et al 201623 Meta-analysis 3 RCT and 8 observational studies, 3145 Mortality Ascites
443 (14%)
NS NS NS NS NS RR: 0.95 (0.67 to 1.35)
RA: 0.95 (0.57 to 1.61).
Mortality rate 6 months BB vs no-BB 52% vs 42.5%
RR 1.37 (0.94 to 1.98)
Kalambokis et al 201667 Observational retrospective, 171 Mortality Ascites NS NS NS NS 3 years NS Median survival
Kimer et al 201573 Retrospective cohort, 61 In-hospital mortality Ascites  31% vs 82%* NS NS Median
80 mg/day
∼3.5 years NS No difference in survival. Complications 76% no-BB vs 78% BB

*Thirty-seven per cent of patients in non-BB group and 13% in the BB group were not characterised with oesophageal endoscopy.

ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; AKI, acute kidney injury; BB, β-blockers; C, carvedilol; CP, Child-Pugh Class; CPT, Child-Push Turcotte; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MELD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease; NS, not stated; NSBB, non-selective β-blocker; P, propranolol; RA, refractory ascites; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RR, relative risk; SBP, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.