Table 2.
City | Authors | Toksoplazma (%) | Rubella (%) | CMV (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IgM + | IgG + | IgM + | IgG + | IgM + | IgG + | |||
Denizli | Karabulut et al. [11] | 1.4 | 37 | 0 | 95.1 | 1.2 | 98.7 | |
Kocaeli | Tamer et al. [16] | 0.4 | 48.3 | 0.2 | 96.1 | 0.7 | 96.4 | |
Edirne | Varol et al. [18] | 0.9 | 31.9 | 0.7 | 76.6 | 1.3 | 80.3 | |
Artvin | Inci et al. [17] | 1.3 | 30.3 | 0.3 | 95.2 | 1.6 | 98.6 | |
Hatay | Ocak et al. [14] | 0.54 | 52 | 0.54 | 95 | 0.4 | 94.9 | |
Malatya | Dogan et al. [12] | – | 37.5 | – | – | – | – | |
Afyon | Yilmazer et al. [19] | – | 30.7 | – | 95.1 | – | 92.6 | |
Mardin | Tekin et al. [28] | 4.6 | 17.5 | 0.95 | 76.5 | – | – | |
Van | Karakas et al. [27] | – | – | 4.8 | 95.2 | – | – | |
Samsun | Uyar et al. [26] | – | – | 1.7 | 94.3 | 1 | 97.3 | |
Sanliurfa | Tekay et al. [13] | 3 | 69.5 | – | – | – | – | |
Ankara | Oruc et al. [32] | – | – | – | – | 0.3 | 98.5 | |
Istanbul | Polat et al. [24] | 0.7 | 48 | |||||
Istanbul | Selek et al. [25] | 0.7 | 24 | – | – | – | – | |
Istanbul | Our study | 0 | 31 | 0.2 | 94.2 | 0.5 | 99.5 |
CMV: Cytomegalovirus.