Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 24;6(4):703–711. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.703

Table 2.

Relationship between various parameters at 10-year post-liver transplantation and the incidence of hepatic steatosis on 10-year post-liver transplantation biopsy

All subjects n = 72 No HS n = 48 HS n = 24 P1
Age at the time of survey 49 ± 15 47 ± 15 53 ± 12 NS
≥ 60 yr aged patients 28% 27% 29% NS
Histological lesions
Steatosis 33% - 100%
Macrovacuolar 28% - 82%
Microvacuolar 1% - 4%
Combined Mac-Mic 4% - 14%
Initial and 10-yr maintained steatosis 8% (5 pat.) 0% 22% 0.002
Fibrosis (F1-F4) 53% 44% 71% 0.03
F1-F2 40% 35% 50% NS
F3-F4 13% 8% 21% NS
Combined fibrosis-steatosis 24% 0% 71% < 0.0001
HCV(+) Fibrosis 44% 31% 71% < 0.001
Bile duct lesions 36% 42% 25% NS
Minimal change 23% 27% 17% NS
Other potential steatosis factors
BMI (kg/m2) 22.4 ± 3.8 22.3 ± 3.9 22.6 ± 3.4 NS
Underweight (BMI ≤ 18.5) 13% 17% 4%
Normal weight (BMI = 18.5-24.9) 69% 65% 79% NS
Overweight (BMI = 25-29.9) 14% 14% 13%
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) 4% 4% 4%
HCV infection (de novo or recurrence) 57% 46% 79% 0.007
Arterial hypertension 53% 52% 54% NS
Glycemia (mmol/L) 5.4 ± 2.0 5.1 ± 0.9 6.2 ± 3.2 NS
Diabeties mellitus 10% 8% 13% NS
Maintenance immunosuppresssion
Cyclosporine A 96% 96% 96% NS
Dosage (mg) 129.8 ± 58.1 135.0 ± 61.5 119.5 ± 50.4 NS
Prednisolone 93% 96% 88% NS
Dosage (mg) 6.8 ± 3.1 6.9 ± 3.2 6.7 ± 2.9 NS
Azathioprine 43% 40% 50% NS
Dosage (mg) 48.4 ± 15.7 51.3 ± 15.5 43.8 ± 15.5 NS

Continuous data are represented as mean ± SD, and categorical data as percentage.

1

Comparison between HS and No HS. HS: Hepatic steatosis; NS: Not significant; BMI: Body mass index.