Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;22(47):10406–10414. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10406

Table 2.

Predictive factors associated with FDG avidity

Non-avid patients PET-avid patients UVA
n (%) n (%) P value
ECOG-PS1 0 9 (60) 8 (40) 0.58
1 5 (33) 9 (47)
≥ 2 1 (7) 2 (11)
Gender Female 1 (7) 8 (42) 0.0474
Male 14 (93) 11 (58)
Pathology-differentiation Well 10 (67) 8 (42) 0.311
Moderate 1 (7) 5 (26)
Poor 0 (0) 1 (5)
Unknown 4 (27) 5 (26)
BCLC stage2 A 3 (20) 1 (5) 0.123
B 6 (40) 4 (21)
C+ 6 (40) 14 (74)
Tumor burden ≤ 50% 14 (93) 15 (79) 0.3554
> 50% 1 (7) 4 (21)
Portal vein thrombosis No 14 (93) 15 (79) 0.24
Yes 5 (33) 10 (53)
Extrahepatic disease No 14 (93) 17 (90) 1.004
Yes 1 (7) 2 (11)
Prior treatment No 9 (60) 10 (53) 0.67
Yes 6 (40) 9 (47)
Child-Pugh-class A 14 (93) 17 (90) 1.004
B 1 (7) 2 (11)
Viral hepatitis No 8 (53) 14 (74) 0.22
Yes 7 (47) 5 (26)
Cirrhosis No 14 (93) 16 (84) 0.41
Yes 10 (67) 10 (53)
Median (Range) Median (Range)
Age 59 (46-84) 71 (57-84) 0.10
PET SUV3 2(2-2) 6(3-20) -
Initial AFP 12 (1-478) 16 (2-186000) 0.23
Volume treated (mL) 1260 (400-2044) 1091 (191-2340) 0.39
Dose delivered (Gy) 125.9 (111.1-478.6) 128.5 (110.5-467.5) 0.66

1Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status;

2

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging classification;

3

Standardized uptake value;

4

Fisher’s exact test used. AFP: Alpha feto protein.