Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;6:38838. doi: 10.1038/srep38838

Table 4. Allocation coefficients to leaf biomass, structural biomass, and root biomass for the studied species according to the shading treatment at date 9.

Species Biomass compartment shading
Final model r2
L S
Bridelia ferruginea leaf 0.359 0.283 0.995
stem 0.308 0.258 0.986
root 0.330 0.432 0.993
sum 0.997 0.973  
Ceiba pentandra leaf 0.177 0.177 0.942
stem 0.575 0.575 0.989
root 0.263 0.236 0.994
sum 1.015 0.988  
Cynometra megalophylla leaf 0.249 0.249 0.987
stem 0.386 0.386 0.995
root 0.349 0.349 0.990
sum 0.984 0.984  
Piliostigma thonningii leaf 0.396 0.275 0.989
stem 0.266 0.219 0.993
root 0.437 0.356 0.994
sum 1.099 0.850  

Shading, L (light) and S (shade). Coefficients computed as slopes of regressions (forced through the origin) between increase in biomass compartments and increase in total biomass between dates 3 and 9. All coefficients are significant at the 5% level. Regression models were simplified until all remaining effects were significantly different from each other (equal coefficients were merged into a single coefficient). The sum of the three coefficients should be equal to 1, however since they were estimated as regression coefficients there was no such constraint put on their estimation: we provide the sum as an assessment of the estimate quality.