Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2016 Dec 7;4(12):2325967116673560. doi: 10.1177/2325967116673560

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Conventional CT Versus CBCT Patellar Measurements Between Raters by Type of CT^a

	Conventional CT			CBCT
Measurement	Rater 1	Rater 2	P Value	Rater 1	Rater 2	P Value
Tilt angle, deg	28.0 ± 7.3	28.2 ± 7.3	.78	18.1 ± 12.3	18.2 ± 11.3	.93
Congruence angle, deg	22.8 ± 17.3	30.7 ± 20.1	.002	0.15 ± 31.1	5.8 ± 30.8	.09
TT-TG offset, mm	21.4 ± 4.2	18.9 ± 4.3	<.0001	12.8 ± 6.3	11.8 ± 7.6	.46

^aData are presented as mean ± SD. CBCT, cone beam computed tomography; CT, computed tomography; TT-TG, tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove.