Table 2. Functional impact of the Heliconius set.
| Species | Complete gene | % | < Sim 2.5% | Gene | % | <Sim 2.5% | CDS | % | <Sim 2.5% | Intron | % | <Sim 2.5% | UTR | % | <Sim 2.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heliconius melpomene | 23 | 5.2 | No | 157 | 35.3 | Yes | 92 | 20.7 | Yes | 45 | 10.1 | No | 27 | 6.1 | No |
| Heliconius cydno | 41 | 8.9 | No | 210 | 45.8 | No | 154 | 33.6 | No | 42 | 9.2 | No | 20 | 4.4 | No |
Abbreviations: CDS, coding sequence; UTR, untranslated region.
Observed absolute counts and proportion of duplications overlapping complete genes, genes, CDS, introns and UTRs. <Sim 2.5% column indicates whether the observed proportion of overlap with each category falls within the 2.5% confidence interval of the simulated data overlap after 10 000 iterations. If <sim 2.5% is ‘No', then duplication counts are not within the 2.5% confidence interval and the overlaps observed do not significantly differ from random expectations. If ‘Yes', then counts are within the 2.5% confidence interval and the overlap observed is significantly less than expected under a random distribution. A single duplication can fall into several subcategories.