Table 3. Univariate analysis of predictors of attitudes and beliefs about back pain for continuous and categorical variables among elderly, acute low back pain participants.
CES-D | FES-I-Brazil | Falls | RMDQ | TUG | GS | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBQ | n=528 | n=513 | n=524 | n=496 | n=525 | n=527 | |
r | –0.331 | –0.227 | –0.052 | –0.369 | –0.085 | 0.117 | |
p | <0.001‡ | <0.001‡ | 0.231 | <0.001‡ | 0.051‡ | 0.007‡ | |
BBQ | Number of falls | Expectation of return to activities | |||||
Yes | No | p | Return | The same | No return | p | |
(n=289) | (n=187) | (n=53) | |||||
(mean | 22.6 | 23.9 | 0.096† | 24.3 | 23.8 | 19.5 | <0.001 * |
and SD) | (6.6) | (6.6) | (7.0) | (5.7) | (6.3) | <0.001 ** | |
0.652 *** |
BBQ: Back Beliefs Questionnaire; CES-D: Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression; FES-I-Brazil: Falls Efficacy Scale International-Brazil; RMDQ: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; TUG: Timed Up and Go; GS: Gait speed.
p<0.20 (inputs in the final model).
r: Pearson's correlation analysis.
Independent t test; one way ANOVA (post-hoc Tukey).
p-value between groups “return” and “no return”;
“the same” and “no return”;
“return” and “the same”;
SD: Standard Deviation Significant p<0.05.