Table 7. Performance of meta-predictors using preprocess-I transformation under multi-fold cross validation and in independent dataset.
Predictor | Dataset | SENS | SPEC | ACC | MCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meta-I-4S | D163* | 93.3 ± 2.8% | 98.8 ± 1.6% | 96.1 ± 2.2% | 0.92 ± 0.04 |
D1679** | 88.1 ± 2.4% | 92.9 ± 0.1% | 89.5 ± 1.7% | 0.76 ± 0.03 | |
Meta-I-5L | D1679* | 79.4 ± 4.4% | 94.0 ± 1.3% | 86.6 ± 1.6% | 0.74 ± 0.03 |
D163** | 98.9 ± 0.4% | 93.2 ± 3.3% | 96.0 ± 1.4% | 0.92 ± 0.03 |
(*) Meta-I-4S is composed of four individual predictors: MiPred, miReNA, MiRPara, and ProMiR. The predictor was optimized in the D163 dataset using three-fold cross validation; Meta-I-5L is composed of five individual predictors: MiPred, miReNA, MiRPara, ProMiR, and TripSVM. It was trained in the D1679 dataset using five-fold cross validation.
(**) The performance of these two predictors in independent dataset, which was D1679 for Meta-I-4S and D163 for Meta-I-5L, was averaged over three- or five-iterations of prediction that correspond to three- or five-fold cross validation. Errors were standard errors calculated from either three- or five-iterations of prediction.