Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Mach Learn Comput. 2015 Jun;5(3):192–197. doi: 10.7763/IJMLC.2015.V5.506

TABLE II.

Validation AUC of the tumor cohort across different classifiers

Classifier Augmented variables Traditional variables
AUC SD AUC SD
Random Forest 0.826 0.010 0.774 0.012
Lasso 0.810 0.011 0.780 0.012
Naïve bayes 0.794 0.011 0.757 0.012
Neural nets 0.772 0.012 0.481 0.014
kNN 0.767 0.012 0.712 0.014
SVM 0.761 0.011 0.667 0.013
Logistic regression 0.563 0.053 0.727 0.014

Table II shows AUC and bootstrapped standard deviation of the tumor validation dataset for the best performing combination of tuning parameters and sampling techniques for each family of classifiers