Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;19(6):485–494. doi: 10.1089/rej.2015.1791

Table 5.

Assessment at Baseline and After the Intervention in the Group of Alzheimer's Disease

  EG CG Group × time interaction
  Baseline Follow-up p-Valuea Baseline Follow-up p-Valuea Fb Effect size
Forward verbal span 3.9 (1) 4.23 (1) 0.004 4.36 (0.9) 4.19 (1.1) 0.232 7.69** 0.083
Backward verbal span 1.91 (0.9) 2.23 (1.1) 0.017 2.11 (1.0) 1.89 (1.0) 0.168 9.36** 0.099
GDS 9.78 (7) 9.96 (6.9) 0.745 8.65 (5.8) 9.89 (6.1) 0.031 1.69 0.020
MMSE 20.48 (4.2) 20.5 (4.5) 0.976 20.11 (4.2) 20.14 (4) 0.922 0.02 0.000
ADL 5.39 (0.9) 5.43 (0.8) 0.486 4.98 (1.2) 4.87 (1.2) 0.024 4.81* 0.054
IADL 3.37 (1.9) 3.63 (1.9) 0.009 3.37 (2) 3.13 (2) 0.002 16.53*** 0.163
Prose memory test 4.71 (3.8) 5.34 (3.6) 0.220 3.49 (3.4) 3.61 (3.2) 0.722 1.20 0.014
Word pairinglearning test 4.1 (2.4) 4.75 (2.9) 0.044 4.25 (2.7) 4.08 (2.8) 0.617 3.34 0.038
Supra-span of Corsi 3.99 (1.3) 4.03 (1.1) 0.772 4.01 (1.2) 4 (1.3) 0.931 0.01 0.000
Semantic word fluency test 0.87 (1.2) 1.02 (1.1) 0.181 1 (1.1) 0.83 (1) 0.044 4.75* 0.053
Attentive matrices 26.4 (8.6) 28.35 (10.1) 0.036 29.76 (9) 29.15 (8.6) 0.175 12.62*** 0.136
ADAS 20.6 (9.3) 17.3 (9.2) <0.001 19.6 (9.6) 19.59 (9.2) 0.959 10.66** 0.111

Data presented as mean (SD).

a

Paired t-test between baseline and follow-up assessment.

b

Repeated-measures ANOVA testing interaction of intervention (EG vs. CG) per time (baseline vs. follow-up) for each outcome; adjusted for age and years of education. F test and p-value (*<0.05; **<0.01; ***<0.001); effect size is partial eta squared (ηpartial2) for group × time.

Significant values are in bold.