Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 22;27(12):1–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw307

Table 1.

Evidence-based criteria for a prognostic gene signature in the path from the laboratory to clinical practice

No. Concept Elaboration
1 Proof of concept Do signature levels differ substantially between patients with and without outcome?
2 Analytical validity Signature's ability to accurately and reliably measure the genotype of interest between and within laboratories
3 Clinical validity Does the signature predict risk of outcome in multiple external cohorts or nested case–control/case–cohort studies?
4 Incremental value Does the signature add enough information to established clinico-pathological prognostic markers or provide a more reproducible measurement of one of them?
5 Clinical impact Does the signature change predicted risk sufficiently to change recommended therapy?
6 Clinical utility Does use of the signature improve clinical outcome, especially when prospectively used for treatment decisions in a randomized controlled trial?
7 Cost-effectiveness Does use of the signature improve clinical outcome sufficiently to justify the additional costs of testing and treatment?