Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 8;2016:1863508. doi: 10.1155/2016/1863508

Table 2.

Comparison of frontal test battery in PD patients and controls.

Demographic data PD-H PD-NH Controls p
mean ± SD n = 12 n = 23 n = 18
Attention
 Stroop Test (errors) 7.92 ± 9.09 7.33 ± 8.45 3.41 ± 5.19 0.151
 TMT-A (s) 122.21 ± 87.47ab 70.84 ± 41.47 52.76 ± 30.27 0.018
 TMT-B (s) 241.21 ± 121.73 134.00 ± 106.8 124.76 ± 84.81 0.264
 Digit Span 15.64 ± 4.24 15.88 ± 2.76 17.27 ± 4.54 0.198
Visual-constructional ability
 Block Design (score) 7.21 ± 4.16 12.08 ± 4.05 11.50 ± 3.78 0.255
 R–O-copy (score) 25.93 ± 10.17ab 32.08 ± 6.55 33.47 ± 1.91 <0.001
Verbal fluency
 Word list generation 41.00 ± 14.81 44.21 ± 11.29 46.47 ± 8.68 0.122
Memory
 Wordlist learning recall (number) 17.21 ± 3.66 19.19 ± 3.76 22.29 ± 1.45 0.301
 R–O-recall (score) 7.71 ± 6.76 11.96 ± 9.19 13.00 ± 8.32 0.549
Higher executive function
 Similarities (score) 9.29 ± 6.08 10.12 ± 7.11 13.53 ± 4.58 0.760
 Five-Point Test (correct number) 2.79 ± 2.46 4.57 ± 2.92 5.35 ± 2.52 0.485
 WCST-category (number) 5.21 ± 2.12 6.00 ± 1.71 6.24 ± 2.31 0.697
 WCST-PN/total errors (%) 63.00 ± 32.91b 72.80 ± 31.40c 25.29 ± 20.95 0.027
Motor programming
 Luria's Hand Sequence (score) 1.29 ± 1.07ab 2.23 ± 1.14 2.12 ± 0.68 0.019

PD-H: PD patients with visual hallucinations; PD-NH: PD patients without visual hallucinations; TMT: Trail Making Test; R–O Complex Figure Test: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; WCST: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

p: p value, by one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with age, gender, and education as covariates.

Post hoc analysis with Tukey method (aPD-H versus PD-NH, bPD-H versus controls, and cPD-NH versus controls).