Table 3. Overview of Planned Comparisons to Further Explore the Effect of the Previous Gamble on Performance in the Perceptual Decision-Making Task of Experiment 4 and the Go Task of Experiment 5.

Experiment	diff	Lower CI	Upper CI	t	p	gav	BF
Note. RT = reaction time; diff = difference; CI = confidence interval; gav = Hedge’s average g; BF = Bayes factor. For all comparisons, df = 39.
Experiment 4
Start RT
Nongamble vs. gambled loss	140	111	168	9.872	<.001	.798	2.38 × 109
Nongamble vs. gambled win	30	−11	71	1.485	.146	.156	.47
Gambled loss vs. gambled win	−110	−138	−81	−7.805	<.001	.611	6.77 × 106
Go accuracy
Nongamble vs. gambled loss	.013	−.011	.037	1.102	.277	.201	.30
Nongamble vs. gambled win	.000	−.034	.034	.022	.983	.005	.17
Gambled loss vs. gambled win	−.013	−.047	.022	−.746	.460	.137	.22
Go RT
Nongamble vs. gambled loss	35	4	67	2.284	.028	.190	1.72
Nongamble vs. gambled win	−13	−37	12	−1.043	.303	.067	.28
Gambled loss vs. gambled win	−48	−76	−21	−3.525	.001	.245	28.07
Experiment 5
Start RT
Nongamble vs. gambled loss	118	75	161	5.544	<.001	.450	8073
Nongamble vs. gambled win	9	−31	49	.456	.651	.032	.19
Gambled loss vs. gambled win	−109	−147	−72	−5.900	<.001	.370	23,318
Go accuracy
Nongamble vs. gambled loss	.021	.002	.039	2.240	.031	.318	1.58
Nongamble vs. gambled win	−.006	−.026	.014	−.611	.545	.089	.20
Gambled loss vs. gambled win	−.027	−.046	−.007	−2.744	.009	.346	4.41
Go RT
Nongamble vs. gambled loss	12	−5	30	1.423	.163	.070	.432
Nongamble vs. gambled win	14	−3	31	1.711	.095	.081	.646
Gambled loss vs. gambled win	2	−14	17	.247	.806	.011	.176