Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 3;43(1):147–168. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000284

Table 4. Overview of the Combined Analysis to Explore the Effect of the Previous Gamble on Choice Data.

Dependent variable diff Lower CI Upper CI t p gav BF
Note. diff = difference; CI = confidence interval; gav = Hedge’s average g; BF = Bayes factor.
pgamble
 Nongamble vs. gambled loss −.029 −.052 −.005 2.434 .016 .149 1.47
 Nongamble vs. gambled win .044 .067 .067 3.725 <.001 .217 60.12
 Gambled loss vs. gambled win .073 .049 .096 6.149 <.001 .370 6.77 × 106
Choice latency
 Nongamble vs. gambled loss 14 3 26 2.499 .013 .065 1.71
 Nongamble vs. gambled win −18 −32 −4 2.486 .014 .078 1.66
 Gambled loss vs. gambled win −32 −45 −20 4.950 <.001 .143 6,833