Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0167921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167921

Table 6. Multivariate adjusted association of metabolic risk factors by tertiles of energy adjusted rice intake.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Beta (SE) P value Beta (SE) P value Beta (SE) P value Beta (SE) P value
FBG 0.05(0.001) 0.43 0.05(5.40) 0.45 0.04(5.33) 0.55 0.04(5.16) 0.45
HbA1c 0.01(0.02) 0.82 0.03(0.15) 0.64 0.02(0.15) 0.68 0.008(0.15) 0.80
TG -0.05(7.73) 0.40 -0.04(7.91) 0.54 -0.04(7.90) 0.49 -0.05(8.08) 0.41
TC 0.03(3.26) 0.59 0.05(3.34) 0.45 0.04(3.33) 0.50 0.03(3.39) 0.64
HDL-c -0.07(3.27) 0.23 -0.08(3.37) 0.22 -0.08(3.38) 0.32 -0.09(3.47) 0.18
LDL-c 0.06(0.002) 0.37 0.07(2.09) 0.28 0.06(2.09) 0.31 0.05(2.13) 0.44

FBG fasting blood glucose, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-c high density lipoprotein, LDL-c low density lipoprotein

In all cases linear regression coefficient was expressed as standardized coefficients Beta and standard error of mean as SE and p value of regression

Model 1 was adjusted for Age, sex

Model 2 was adjusted for Age, sex, fruit and meat intake (g/1000 Kcal per day)

Model 3 was adjusted for Age, sex, fruit and meat intake (g/1000 Kcal per day), fiber intake (g/1000 Kcal per day)

Model 4 was adjusted for Age, sex, fruit and meat intake (g/1000 Kcal per day), fiber intake (g/1000 Kcal per day) and duration of diabetes