Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 16;12:1–9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S124003

Table 1.

Comparison of the management in the intervention group (CGA) and the control group (conventional acute medical care)

Characteristics CGA and care Conventional acute medical care
Department and facilities Two MÄVA (acute elderly care CGA units) wards with a total of 48 beds: one, two, or four bedrooms; Division of Internal Medicine and Emergency Care Wards of internal and emergency medicine: one, two, or four bedrooms; Division of Internal Medicine and Emergency Care
Team members
 Physicians Yes. Specialists in internal medicine, family medicine and/or geriatrics Yes. Specialists in internal medicine
 Licensed practicing nurses Yes. Including specialized admission and discharge nurses Yes
 Occupational therapists Yes No. Only counseling
 Physiotherapists Yes No. Only counseling
 Nutritionists No. Only counseling No. Only counseling
Treatment Systematic, structured interdisciplinary CGA and care by validated instruments focusing on the following: somatic and mental health, medication review, functional and activity ability including early rehabilitation, social situation, and early discharge planning Following routines at departments of internal medicine and emergency care according to guidelines
Admission route Directly to the MÄVA ward via ambulance or primary care Via the emergency ward

Notes: For both groups, standard management procedures according to national and international guidelines were followed.

Abbreviation: CGA, comprehensive geriatric assessment.