Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov;8(11):3232–3244. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.11.72

Table 6. Proportion of cardiothoracic (CT) faculty who completed all their CT surgical training outside the US according to seniority, subspecialty and institutional ranking.

All CT surgical training completed outside the US Cardiac and thoracic surgeons Cardiac surgeons only Thoracic surgeons only
All CT centers Top CT centers Other CT centers All CT centers Top CT centers Other CT centers All CT centers Top CT centers Other CT centers
All faculty
   Yes 54 (7.8) 31 (10.4) 23 (5.8) 40 (8.2) 25 (12.3) 15 (5.2) 14 (6.8) 6 (6.3) 23 (21.3)
   No 640 (92.2) 268 (89.6) 372 (94.2) 449 (91.8) 178 (87.7) 271 (94.8) 191 (93.2) 90 (93.8) 85 (78.7)
   P 0.038± 0.008± 0.98±
Junior faculty
   Yes 16 (6.3) 11 (10.6) 5 (3.3) 14 (9.0) 11 (17.5) 3 (3.2) 2 (2.0) 0 (0) 2 (3.5)
   No 238 (93.7) 93 (89.4) 145 (96.7) 142 (91.0) 52 (82.5) 90 (96.8) 96 (98.0) 41 (100.0) 55 (96.5)
   P 0.038± 0.006± 0.51FET
Senior faculty
   Yes 36 (8.2) 19 (9.8) 17 (7.0) 24 (7.3) 13 (9.4) 11 (5.7) 12 (11.2) 6 (10.9) 6 (11.5)
   No 401 (91.8) 174 (90.2) 227 (93.0) 306 (92.7) 125 (90.6) 181 (94.3) 95 (88.8) 49 (89.1) 46 (88.5)
   P 0.36± 0.29± 1±

Data expressed as number (percentage). For some CT surgeons “year of graduation from medical school” is missing data. ±, Chi square test. FET, Fisher exact test.