Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 15;8(6):423–432. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.423

Table 5. Paired samples test at 95%, null hypothesis stating that for each type of material, the mean values obtained with 2 or 3 mm of gingival thickness are similar. The null hypothesis was rejected for all types of material with the exception of zirconium dioxide, Standard shade.

Paired samples test
Difference by pair
Mean Standard deviation Standard error of the mean 95% confidence interval for the difference t Degree of freedom Sig. (bilateral)
Inferior Superior
Pair 1 Ti (2 mm)
vs
Ti (3 mm)
5.7188 3.2254 1.1403 3.0223 8.4153 5.015 7 0.00154
Pair 2 Zi (2 mm)
vs
Zi (3 mm)
2.2953 2.7516 0.9728 −0.0051 45,957 2.359 7 0.05039
Pair 3 Zi-B1(2 mm)
vs
Zi-B1 (3 mm)
5.73026 2.3461 0.8295 3.7688 7.6917 6.908 7 0.00023
Pair 4 Zi-A-3.5 (2 mm)
vs
Zi-A-3,5 (3 mm)
4.5341 2.3384 0.8268 2.5791 6.4890 5.484 7 0.00092
Pair 5 QA (2 mm)
vs
QA (3 mm)
3.5831 3.7983 1.3429 0.4076 6.7588 2.668 7 0.03208